Wednesday, August 17, 2016

Spartacus (1960) Review

“And maybe there's no peace in this world, for us or for anyone else, I don't know. But I do know that, as long as we live, we must remain true to ourselves.”

    Spartacus is a story of a man who is simple yet proud. He’s a gladiator who desires to be free and will stand up for freedom. So a slave revolt happens and some political factions use this revolt to get what they want out of the Roman Empire. The cast of characters were great, but I just couldn’t find myself to like Kirk Douglas as Spartacus. Maybe it’s because I knew the backstory of how this film was made.  I did like the statement that screenwriter Dalton Trumbo was trying to portray. I also found it intriguing about the homoerotic nature of the Roman bath scene when Crassus and Antoninus discuss their mutual appetites for “snails and oysters”. At the time it was taken out and later put back in during the restoration.
    The initial director scheduled for Spartacus was Anthony Mann, but was fired by Kirk Douglas after shooting one scene. So then Stanley Kubrick was set to direct the film. He and Douglas worked together in the film Paths of Glory.  Kubrick had little artistic freedom with this film, which is sad because it makes one think how it could have turned out with him in full control. Every time he tried to direct the Kubrick way Douglas would fight with him.  Kirk Douglas wanted Spartacus to be all about Douglas, that’s why he was a producer. He needed it to be his Ben Hur.
    Spartacus is a Kubrick film and yet it is not a Kubrick film. If you ask a Kubrick fan if they like the film they’d usually say that they’re disappointed with it because it was too Hollywood for a Kubrick film compared to the rest of his filmography. Then ask someone who is not a fan of Kubrick, probably a Michael Bay fan, and they’d most likely say that they enjoyed it. So is it a bad film? I don’t consider it a bad film it’s still a better film than most of the junk Hollywood makes nowadays. It’s a respectable film. Fairly good, but it’s no masterpiece or a great film. Kubrick deserves a whole lot of credit for making this film work.

4.2 out of 5

No comments:

Post a Comment